Water industry regulator Ofwat has called for th development of a joint water and fuel poverty indicator in its response to the Hills Fuel Poverty Review call for evidence.
The response covers the following issues:
- Water affordability risk – Ofwat's indicator and methodology dealing with water affordability.
- Distinguishing fuel poverty from general poverty – Ofwat thinks that the structure and distribution of water bills makes water affordability distinct from general poverty. The same can hold true for fuel poverty too.
- Using a basket of indicators – Ofwat's advisory group recommended that a basket of indicators helps to capture affordability better, and prevents an undue focus on a single measure of a multi-dimensional issue.
- Designing income-based indicators
- Expenditure-based indicators – Ofwat said it may be effective to look at the bills that customers can afford, given their other outgoings. This may be a better way of looking at affordability than bills as a proportion of income.
The regulator believes that there are advantages to working together to develop joint thinking and measures on poverty-related issues and is interested in exploring further how it can work with the Review team and DECC's fuel poverty team. Ofwat says that there is a case for developing an indicator that captures the affordability of expenditure on energy and water, because both are essential services.
Click here to read Ofwat's response in full.
Craig Nienaber, Business Development Manager for Safe Access Solutions (SAS) at HUBER Technology, explores why the company is seeing a growing level of interest in its safe access solutions for critical infrastructure providers, including their application in wastewater treatment assets.

Hear how United Utilities is accelerating its investment to reduce spills from storm overflows across the Northwest.